Contributors:
Carlos P. Zalaquett, University of South Florida
Resources:
American Counseling Association: Identifying and treating depression: Diversity and depression; Eyes Wide Open; Basic Facts About Clinical Depression; Depression in the Workplace; Major Depression and Dysthymic Disorder in Adolescents: The Critical Role of School Counselors; The Next Advancement in Counseling: The Bio-Psycho-Social Model.
Healthline: Depression.
NICE Guidelines: Depression in adults quality standard (QS8); Depression in children and young people: Identification and management in primary, community and secondary care (CG28);
Mental Health America: Depression;
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH): Depression: Depression and College Students.
Prevalence
Clinical depression affects about 6.7 percent of U.S. adults during a year. Prevalence is higher among women (8.1%) than men (4.6%). Depression affects 8.3 percent of youth between the ages of 12 to 17. Prevalence among girls (12.4%) is nearly 3 times that for boys (4.3%) (National Institute of Mental Health, 2013, a, b). Clinical depression is the leading cause of disability in the U.S. for ages 15-44 (National Institute of Mental Health, 2013, c; Vos et al., 2012; World Health Organization, 2008).
Resources: National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH): Statistics.
Clinical depression ranks third among the leading causes of disease burden worldwide, but it ranks first in middle- and high-income countries. Yet, many professionals have difficulties recognizing and diagnosing depression. When diagnosed, less than half of clients receive the appropriate diagnosis and fewer receive adequate treatment. Outcomes can be improved by using accepted assessment tools within a system of measurement-based care (Gelenber, 2010; Zalaquett & Stens, 2006).
Several tools are available for performing systematic and objective (a) screening, (b) diagnosis, and (c) monitoring treatment (Galenberg, 2010). Clinical suggestions: Use screening and diagnostic tools routinely to detect and diagnose depression; use patient-rated instruments to save time. Use treatment algorithms and collaborative care to manage depression effectively. Measure depressive symptoms, side effects of treatment, and suicide risk.
(a) Screening tools
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D; Radloff, 1977)
The CES-D is a 20-item scale developed to measure symptoms of depression in community populations. The CES-D has 4 separate factors: Depressive affect, somatic symptoms, positive affect, and interpersonal relations. The CES-D has good internal consistency with alphas of .85 for the general population and .90 for a psychiatric population. Resources: The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD).
9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Spitzer, Kroenke, & Williams, 1999)
The PHQ- 9 is a self-report depression assessment tool, derived from the interview-based PRIME-MD. Completion of the instrument takes about 5 minutes. Useful for the diagnosis of major depression in primary care, with acceptable reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity (Richardson et al., 2010; Phelan et al., 2010). A shorter version, the PHQ-2, includes the first 2 items of the PHQ-9 and evaluates its presence during the last 2-weeks. (McGuire et al., 2013). Resources: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ ) screeners; The MacArthur Initiative on Depression and Primary Care
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P., 1983)
The HADS is a 14 questions self-rating scale. The scale measures anxiety and depression in both hospital and community settings. The one page scale can be completed in 2 to 5 minutes. The specificity for HADS-A is 0.78 and sensitivity is 0.9. For HADS-D specificity is 0.79 and sensitivity is 0.83 (Bjelland et al., 2002).
Resources: HADScale’s Scoring Sheet.
Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (Zung SDS; Zung, 1965)
The Zung SDS is a 20-item self-report screening questionnaire, covering affective, psychological and somatic symptoms of depression. Completion takes about 10 minutes. Alpha coefficient ranges from .79 to .88 (Thurver et al., 2002). Monitors changes in depression severity over time (World Health Organization, 2013). Resources: Zung Depression Scale; Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale.
(b) Diagnostic Instruments
The PHQ-9 and the Zung Depression Scale can be used for diagnosing as well as screening for clinical depression.
(c) Monitoring Instruments
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck et al., 1961)
The BDI –II is a 21-item self-report inventory measuring the severity of depression in adolescents and adults. The BDI-II is used as an indicator of the severity of depression, but not as a diagnostic tool. The internal scale reliability among older adults and among adults are alpha .86 and alpha .02, respectively. Completion time is about 10 min- utes. Resources: Beck Depression Inventory®–II (BDI®–II).
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS; Hamilton, M., 1960)
The HDRS has 17 original items; new versions include as many as 29. Completion of scale takes 20 minutes. Questions 18-21 may be recorded to give further information about the depression (e.g., diurnal variation or presence of paranoid symptoms), but are not part of the scale. The instrument has acceptable psychometric properties and is available in clinician- and patient-rated versions. Resources: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS; Rush et al., 2003)
The QIDS is a 16 items instrument that measures similar symptoms as the IDQ. Test-retest reliability’s Cronbach’s alpha= 0.85 for self-rated scale. Resources: The QIDS.
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS; Montgomery & Åsberg, 1979)
The MADRS is a 10 items instrument used to assess clients’ mood, feelings of unease, sleep, appetite, ability to concentrate, initiative, emotional involvement, pessimism and zest for life. Higher scores indicate increased depression. The instrument is client or patient administered and completion takes about 20 minutes.
Resources: MADRS Scale.
Other Assessments: Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS) is useful to identify remission and assesses psychosocial impairment, and quality of life. Resources: CUDOS.
Adverse effects. The Frequency, Intensity, and Burden of Side Effects Rating (FIBSER) scale is useful to monitor side effects of depression treatment, as well as their interference with functioning. The scale does not address specific side effects; counselors need to ask about specific concerns. Resources: FIBSER.
Suicidality. Possible suicide and increased suicidal thoughts and behaviors in clients taking antidepressant medications are worldwide concerns. The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is useful to monitor suicidal- ity. Resources: C-SSRS.
Cognitive-based therapies (CT)
Cognitive therapy (CT) is a time limited, collaborative therapy (Beck, 1967). The goals of CT are to change thoughts, improve skills, and modify emotional states that contribute to mental disorders. Cognitive therapy can be applied in multiple ways using techniques from Beck’s (Beck, 1967) cognitive therapy model, Ellis’s (Ellis, 1973; Ellis & Grieger, 1986) rational emotive behavioral therapy model, or Meichenbaum’s (1977) cognitive behavioral modification program, all of whom are major contributors to the field of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). CBT treatment for clinical depression is efficacious and specific (Hollow & Ponniah, 2010; Zalaquett & Stens, 2006). Resources: Beck Institute; Academy of Cognitive Therapy; The Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies; GoodTherapy.org
Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT)
Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) for depression focuses on interpersonal roles and conflicts (Kennedy & Tanen- baum, 2000). IPT includes three phases of treatment addressing two of four main problem areas: grief, interpersonal disputes, role transition, and interpersonal deficits. Short-term IPT usually involves up to 20 weekly hour- long sessions. IPT treatment for clinical depression is efficacious and specific (Hollow & Ponniah, 2010; Zalaquett & Stens, 2006). Resources: International Society for Interpersonal Psychotherapy; Interpersonal Therapy for depression; Interpersonal Psychotherapy: An overview:
Behavior Therapy (BT)
Behavioral interventions include contextual approaches based on functional analyses (contingency management and behavioral activation), social skills training, self-control therapy, problem-solving therapy, and behavioral marital therapy. Common therapeutic strategies include self-monitoring, self-reinforcement, graded task assignments, activity scheduling, and targeted improvements in social skills through assertiveness training, modeling, and role-playing. Relaxation training is used to cope with anxiety or insomnia. BT treatment for clinical depression is efficacious and specific (Hollow & Ponniah, 2010; Zalaquett & Stens, 2006). Resources: Behavior Therapy vs.Cognitive Therapy For Depression: Here We Go Again.
Brief Dynamic Therapy (BDT)
BDT explores unconscious processes, process lifetime developmental issues, and facilitates client insight and life changes. Main goal is to increase insight into the unconscious processes by leading clients to repeat past experiences and to institute corrective experiences through the interaction with their therapists (Nordhus & Nielsen, 1999); transference and countertransference are important (Gatz et al., 1998). BDT treatment for clinical depression is possible efficacious (Hollow & Ponniah, 2010). Resources: Brief Dynamic Therapy; Short-Term Psychodynamic Therapy for Depression:
Emotionally focused therapy (EFT)
Emotionally focused therapy (EFT) is a short-term (8-20 sessions) structured therapeutic approach to working with individuals, couples and families. It is based in attachment theory but includes elements of experiential, person-centered, constructivist, and systems theory. EFT treatment for clinical depression is possible efficacious (Hollow & Ponniah, 2010). Resources: The International Centre for Excellence in Emotionally Focused Therapy (ICEEFT ); FAQ’s - Emotion Focused Therapy.
Newer psychological interventions are as efficacious as medication in the treatment of clinical depression (Hollon& Ponniah, 2010).
Other therapeutic options
Antidepressant medication, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).
Additional Resources
The Macarthur Initiative on Depression and Primary Care: Depression Management Tool Kit.
The Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress: Courage to Care – Depression in Primary Care.
The Importance of Cultural Constructs
A culturally-sensitive therapeutic approach is of essence. There are recognized cross-cultural variations in present- ing symptoms of depression. For example, guilt, self-blame, amount of suicidal ideation, and somatization vary across different U.S. cultural groups. Considerable variability between countries in the management of clinical de- pression led to the development of the International Consensus Statement on Major Depressive Disorder. Experts adapted Japan’s treatment algorithm and offered specific recommendations for screening, diagnosing, and treating depression. Resources: International Consensus Statement on Major Depressive Disorder.
REFERENCES
Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry. 4, 561–571.
Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T., & Neckelmann, D. (2002). The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 52 (2): 69–77. PMID 11832252
Ellis, A. (1973). Humanistic psychotherapy: The rational-emotive approach. New York: Julian Press. Ellis, A., & Grieger, R. (1986). Handbook of rational-emotive therapy: Volume 2. New York: Springer.
Gatz, M., Fiske, A., Kaskie, B., Kasl-Godley, J. E., McCallum, T. J., & Wetherell, J. L. (1998). Empirically validated psychological treatments for older adults. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 4, 9–46.
Gelenberg, A. J. (2010). Using assessment tools to screen for, diagnose, and treat major depressive disorder in clini- cal practice. Journal of Cliical Psychiatry, 71[suppl E1]:e01
Greenberg, L. S. (2010). Emotion-Focused Therapy: A clinical synthesis. FOCUS, 8, 32-42.
Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry,23, 56–62. doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56
Hollon, S. D., & Ponniah, K. (2010). A review of empirically supported psychological therapies for mood disorders in adults. Depression and Anxiety. 27, 891–932. doi: 10.1002/da.20741PMCID: PMC2948609
Kennedy, G. J., & Tanenbaum, S. (2000). Psychotherapy with older adults. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 54, 386–407.
Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of twelve- month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 617-27.
Kroenke. K,. Spitzer, R., L,, & Williams, J. B. (2003). The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Medical Care. 41, 1284–1292. doi:10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C
Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum.
McGuire, A. W., Eastwood, J., Macabasco-O’Connell, A., Hays, R. D., & Doering, L. V. (2013). Depression screening: Utility of the patient health questionnaire in patients with acute coronary syndrome. American Journal of Critical Care, 22, 12-19.
Montgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979). A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 382–389. doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382
National Instititute of Mental Health (2013, a). Major depressive disorder among adults. Downloaded from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/statistics/1MDD_ADULT.shtml
National Instititute of Mental Health (2013, b). Major depressive disorder among children. Downloaded from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/statistics/1MDD_CHILD.shtml
National Instititute of Mental Health (2013, c). The Numbers Count: Mental Disorders in America. Downloaded from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/the-numbers-count-mental-disorders-in-america/index.sht>ml#WHOReportBurden
Nordhus, I. H., & Nielsen, G. H. (1999). Brief dynamic psychotherapy with older adults. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 55, 935–947.
Phelan, E., Williams, B., Meeker, K., Bonn, K., Frederick, J., LoGerfo, J., & Snowden, M. (2010). A study of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-9 in primary care elderly. BMC Family Practice, 11, 63-72.
Radloff, L.S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306
Richardson, L. P., McCauley, E., Grossman, D. C., McCarty, C. A., Richards, J., Russo, J. E., Rockhill, C., & Katon, W. (2010). Evaluation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item for detecting major depression among adolescents. Pediatrics, 126, 6, . DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-0852
Rush, A. J., Gullion. C. M., Basco, M. R., et al. (1996). The inventory of depressive symptomatology (IDS): Psychometric properties. Psychological Medicine, 26, 477–486. doi:10.1017/S0033291700035558
Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M.H., Ibrahim, H. M., et al. (2003). The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), Clinician Rating (QIDS-C), and Self-Report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 573–583. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01866-8
Sheehan, D. V., LeCrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., et al. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 59, 22–33.
Sheehan, D. V. , Sheehan, K. H,, Shytle, R. D,, Janavs, J,, Bannon, Y,, Rogers, J. E,, Milo, K. M,, Stock, S. L,, & Wilkinson, B. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 71, 313-e26. doi: 10.4088/ JCP.09m05305whi.
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams. J. B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1737–1744. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737
Thurber, S., Snow, M., & Honts, C. H. (2002). The Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale : Convergent validity and diagnostic discrimination. Assessment, 9, 401-405. DOI: 10.1177/1073191102238471
Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Naghavi, M., Lozano, R., Michaud, C., Ezzati , M.... Murray, C. (2012). Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet, 380, 2163-2196. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2
World Health Organization. (2008). The global burden of disease: 2004 update, Table A2: Burden of disease in DALYs by cause, sex and income group in WHO regions, estimates for 2004. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. World Health Organization (2013).
Zalaquett, C., & Stens, A. (2006). Psychosocial treatments for major depression and dysthymia in older adults: A review of the research literature. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84, 192-201.
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
Zimmerman, M., & Mattia, J. I. (2001). A self-report scale to help make psychiatric diagnoses: the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 787–794. doi:10.1001/arch- psyc.58.8.787
Zung, W. W. K. (1965). A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, 63–70.
Published: December 2013
Updated: December 2013